OK, it wasn't exactly a
conference. More like a sales pitch. Apparently there's this new
multi-channel music DVD format called DVD-Audio (DVD-A) and apparently we
press folk aren't doing a good enough job talking about it and raising the
public's awareness. So a whole bunch of record labels and manufacturers
gathered all the finest audio and video reviewers together in a room under
the guise of free food and drink to berate us for not proselytizing the
wonder that is DVD-AUDIO. Well (with all due props to Steve Martin)
EXCUUUUUUUSE ME!
But seriously folks, I'm sure most if not all of the people
who frequent the cyber-pages of Enjoy The Music.com™ already know a thing or two about DVD-Audio. Along
with Sony's SACD format, DVD-A is the future of audio reproduction as we
know it, and it is capable of some seriously exciting sounds. But it is also
capable of a lot more. Certainly much more than I had considered and I have
a pretty active imagination. Let's attack head-on a few of the myths about
DVD-Audio, shall we?
Myth #1 - you need a new DVD player
plus a receiver or preamp with a 5.1 channel analog input in order to enjoy
DVD-Audio.
False. DVD-A is actually backwards compatible with all of the
purported 40 million consumer DVD machines already installed in this great
land of ours… well, mostly. Most DVD-A discs can be played in standard DVD
Video players, and they will work. You'll be able to navigate through the
menus, view the extras, and read the song lyrics (when included) plus you'll
get a multi-channel compressed Dolby Digital version of the music itself.
OK, it's not the super-high fidelity that DVD-A is capable of. But it's a
start and it'll work with your current player. So your current DVD player is
DVD-A-"compatible," but it's not DVD-A-"exploitive" (my word).
It is true that you'll need a new DVD-A-exploitive player plus
a receiver or preamp with a multi-channel analog input in order to take full
advantage of the quality that DVD-A has to offer. And what is this quality
of which I speak? Well the standard CD format uses a 16-bit sample word,
sampled 44,100 times per second (henceforth known as 16/44). DVD-Audio
supports up to a 24-bit sample word, sampled at 192,000 times per second
(24-bit/192kHz) for stereo recordings and 24-bit/96kHz for multi-channel
recordings. Simply put, DVD-A is better able to quantify and then
reconstruct the analog audio music waveform.
If you think of DVD-A as a ruler that measures music with
markings every 1/20th of an inch (very precise), then a CD is
like a ruler with a mark at every foot (not very precise). Larger word
lengths sampled more frequently translates into smoother, more
three-dimensional, more accurate sound. Some would say it's "more
analog."
Myth #2 - DVD-Audio is too
expensive
False. 5.1 Entertainment Group (one of the largest current
supporters of DVD-A software) has just lowered their price on DVD-A to
$17.98 across the board. Similarly, Warner Records has lowered the price of
admission to $16.98. These prices represent just a $1 or $2 premium over
current CD list prices. On the hardware side, there are now several models
in the $300-$500 price range that include full DVD-A support.
Myth #3 - all you can get on DVD-A
are those esoteric audiophile recordings - bring on the REAL
music!
False. If nothing else, the label reps made it clear that
DVD-A is intended to be a format for the masses and, as such, will include a
representative sample of all types of music. The lead-in music track of the
first presentation was techno/rock/rap band LINKIN PARK's
Reanimation in glorious 5.1 channel surround. You haven't lived until
you've heard DJs scratching at you from all around the room.
Now you may not be a fan of this type of music (most of the
writers in the room clearly were not, based on the groans, rolled eyes and
snide commentary), but the fact is that there are millions of rap fans out
there with money to spend on gear and discs and the only way that DVD-A will
be commercially viable is if it can satisfy the masses. I wonder when
they'll release the first DVD-A boom box? And will it come with support
braces to suspend all five speakers around your head? Hmmm...
In addition to the standard audiophile-oriented pop artists
like Steely Dan, and classical and jazz selections, you can also now (or
very soon) buy DVD-As featuring the works of Alice Cooper, Fleetwood Mac,
Dishwalla, Queensryche, Bob Marley and the Wailers, and the Sex Pistols,
among others.
One of the label reps stated that they can break even on the
average DVD-A product with just 6,000-10,000 units sold. This may come down
even further as the R&D costs come down and the mastering/authoring
process gets more streamlined. Expect to see many of your old favorites
available in the DVD-A format.
Myth #4 - aha! I knew it! It's all
just another attempt by the greedy record execs to make me go out and buy
the Beatles white album again in yet another format!
Welllll... mostly FALSE. Records, tapes and CDs are all
audio-only media (we won't go into CD-Enhanced because it's a non-starter in
my book). Tapes offered increased portability and convenience over LPs (at a
sacrifice in quality). CDs offered increased quality and convenience over
cassette tapes (and arguably some sonic improvements over LP, but the jury
is still out on that), but really LP, cassette and CD are more alike than
they are different.
DVD-Audio offers not just vastly superior sound quality over
CD, but also the opportunity to gain greater insight into the artist and
into the recording process and deeper meaning to the music. Just as a DVD
can include features that just weren't possible on VHS tape (director's
commentary, deleted scenes, detailed cast and crew information, etc.), so
can DVD-Audio offer similar unique features. The DVD-Audio discs featured in
the conference included on-screen lyrics synched to the music (karaoke
anyone?), live video footage from performances and interviews related to the
album, and even "Easter eggs" - hidden goodies that the die-hard fans will
stumble across over time that will enhance their enjoyment of the material
even further.
For me, the most effective demo of the format was when John
Trickett (CEO of 5.1 Entertainment) showed us a feature of Fleetwood Mac's
Rumours DVD-A which documented the evolution of that album from its
earliest raw incarnation into fully finished songs. Using an audio/video
montage of interviews, studio photos and actual early studio recordings, you
can see and hear the songs evolve from ideas into reality.
Apparently Rumours went through significant
transformation from the first few days of recording and through the months
of studio work. This disc lets you hear the earliest rough cuts of the songs
as well as the artist's explanation of what was going through their heads as
they were creating this master work. Try that with a CD! I don't think so!
For a casual listener, this probably isn't relevant, but just think of the
hours of entertainment that this could give a diehard Mac fan and you begin
to see that $17.98 is a small price to pay indeed.
Myth #5 - DVD-a is a multi-channel
thang - I only DO stereo!
False. Most DVD-A titles include a 24-bit/96kHz stereo mix of
the album. Just like the original CD - only better. Is it better than the
LP? I won't even touch that one...
Myth #6 - you gotta have a TV to
listen to a DVD-A - No TV is coming anywhere near my stereo rig!
False. DVD-A players have direct track access controls on the
unit and on the remote so you can get your music without the need to use the
on-screen menus. But of course you do need a video display unit if you want
to view all the supplemental content on the disc.
Myth #7 - I do most of my music
listening on the road. DVD-A seems like a home-only format.
False. In addition to the portable DVD-A players on display at
the conference, we were also treated by Mark from Panasonic to the
incredible DVD-Audio Cruising Machine. This was a full multi-channel
DVD/DVD-A setup in a car including a head unit, 5.1 channels of
amplification and speakers and a miniature LCD display (for menus, extras
and regular DVD movie watching). Listening to a sampling of music ranging
from Stone Temple Pilots to Eric Clapton and Pat Metheny, I had a very
simple reaction - I WANT IT... NOW! It was a little distracting
(particularly trying to concentrate on a movie while simultaneously avoiding
all that pesky New York traffic), but the DVD-Audio clips sounded fantastic,
a nice layered spatially defined sound with good vocal transparency.
Um... have you become completely
brainwashed??
OK, OK, so I led into this story saying that this was a sales
pitch. But you know what? It was a good pitch and I'm buying! Does this mean
that DVD-A's path to music format domination will be nothing but smooth
sailing? Not by a long shot. There are still obstacles in the way of DVD-A's
success.
Though a good sample of manufacturers were present at the
conference, showing their full support of the format, from the mass market
consumer-oriented brands like Panasonic and Toshiba all the way up to the
ultra high end Meridian (who, by the way invented the completely loss-less
compression mechanism that allows DVD-A to support 5.1 channels of
24-bit/96kHz audio), there were a couple of notable absentees - Sony and
Philips.
Sony and Philips, of course, are advocates of the competing
SACD format which offers similarly excellent two-channel and multi-channel
digital sound. Jeff Samuels from Panasonic went on and on about how
impressed he was to see so many hardware and software vendors working
together toward a common goal. But as long as SACD and DVD-Audio are seen as
an either/or proposition, many audiophiles will be hesitant to jump on board
with a major investment in a format that they fear may one day be
obsolete.
Personally, I say that it makes sense to hedge your bets - buy
a "universal" player (such as Pioneer's DV-47A) which plays back both DVD-A
and SACD discs. Buy the music that you like on whichever format that it's
available, sit back and enjoy the music! If one of the formats runs out of
steam some day and the new releases start to trickle, then you'll still be
able to enjoy all of the discs in your collection.
Also, there is still some controversy over the "watermarking"
that is used on DVD-Audio to protect DVD-A content from being copied in the
analog domain. Many audio purists feel that any copy protection mechanism
that is at all audible must be avoided at all costs. Craig Anderson, from
Warner (who has opted to use watermarking on all Warner's DVD-A releases to
date) got a little defensive when this came up. When asked if watermarking
is audible, he first said "inaudible," but then corrected that to say
"audible, but masked." Huh? He admitted that he has heard an audible
artifact of watermarking, but only for about two seconds on one of the many
discs he has been involved in mastering. Hey, at least he's honest about
it.
It seems to me that the record labels think that the audio
press is making a mountain out of a molehill on the watermarking issue. In
principle, I think that audible watermarking is bad, but in reality, in my
non-critical listening of DVD-A to date, I have not heard anything the least
bit objectionable. Personally, I'll adopt a wait-and-see attitude on this.
I'll wait until I hear it myself before I freak out over something that may
be nothing.
The bigger outstanding issue in my book is the issue of bass
management. Most DVD-A titles are mastered assuming that you have five
identical full-range speakers plus a subwoofer. But most home theater
systems in the real world use small speakers for the surrounds, and
sometimes even for the mains. What this means is that you may be sending low
bass to your little tiny speakers and they may not be able to handle it, and
they certainly will not be able to reproduce it.
Even the most basic home theater receivers solve this problem
with a set-up option that allows you to set the size (and/or crossover
frequency) of all of your speakers. If you select "small" speakers for your
main, center and surrounds, then low bass is routed away from your
satellites and sent to your subwoofer channel. This is why you can get
decent home theater sound from a system comprised of five teeny tiny
satellites plus a sub.
But, since the DVD-A signal is sent to your receiver in the
analog domain, and since most receivers have no bass management for their
multi-channel analog inputs, you're stuck with limited or no bass
management. I personally feel that the best long-term solution to this is to
require bass management to be built into all players, as is done currently
with SACD. Of course, there are solutions to everything. Some DVD-A players
have built in bass management, some receivers have built in analog bass
management, and there are even some outboard boxes that can be used to add
bass management to any system. There are always choices...
I believe it was Craig Eggers, from Toshiba who made a very
good point - DVD-A is only a baby! It has only been a live production format
for a little over two years. The issues that we think are major now will be
solved over time as the format matures. But in my opinion, none of the
objections are critical enough to merit waiting. The water's fine... come on
in!
Reply From 5.1
Entertainment
Chris,
I'm really impressed! You capture the
essence of what this is all about. Don't worry about the intro. It was a
sales pitch - we were trying to get people excited about the
possibilities.
The only thing I disagree with you on is bass
management. I've produced or exec produced over 120 DVD Audio titles. In the
very beginning (about three years ago) it was a problem for engineers, both
creatively and technically. Frankly I listen to some of the earlier albums
that were released by my record labels and cringe at what we did back then.
We've come a long way.
Time, experience and better playback tools
have taught us a lot about how to manage LFE for multiple consumer speaker
systems. One of the ways my production company learned was to network a
really crappy sounding living-sized room in our facility together with the
main studios. This room contains a continually updated set of the cheapest
surround systems available. Our engineers and producers can flip a mix into
this room directly from the board and listen to it in real time on a set of
1" cubes with no sub.
We also flip the variable settings on the
players and see how it's going to sound to the average person. In the
mastering and authoring process we do the same thing and then again in QC on
cheap high speed burned DVD/R's.
Of course we aren't ever going to
design our sound for that. These disks are going to last a long time and
today's hardware environment will evolve and grow. This is much the same as
in the early days of stereo when many producers would have a tinny car
speaker in the centre to hear how a record would sound on AM radio in
mono.
I don't want to dwell on this one issue. Thanks for being there
and doing such a great job in capturing it for your readers...
Regards,
John Trickett
5.1 Entertainment
Chris Replies
Hi John,
I know what you mean about listening on
tinny car speakers. In the three CDs we cut in my previous life as a rock
drummer, we'd listen to each mix on a set of behemoth speakers, a set of
Yamaha NS-10M monitors (blech) and usually on a set of 4" car speakers just
to make sure it didn't sound terrible on any of them.
It's good to
hear that you employ similar techniques in 5.1 mixing. Make sure it sounds
best on a state of the art set up, but doesn't completely suck on the real
world stuff.
Regards,
Chris Boylan