|
July 2014
Rega has never
lost faith in vinyl and analogue audio. It started out making relatively
affordable record players, and at the core of its business has continued to
develop and manufacture such products. The marketplace effectively forced the
company to develop and introduce CD players in the mid-1990s, somewhat
reluctantly it must be said, and Rega took some pride in being the last major
brand to produce a CD player.
Although its CD players have had significant commercial
success, and the company plans to be among the last to stop making them, Rega
has always believed that vinyl is the true format for high fidelity music. It
therefore very gratifying that the last several years have seen demand growing
again for both vinyl discs and the turntables that play them.
Rega had already seen its turntable sales rising slowly but
surely for some years, to the point when it had enough confidence to invest in
the new RP series, round about 2008/9. Based on ideas and concepts that had
been building over some years, this began with the budget price RP1,
and now consists of a range of models that show incremental improvements in a
number of areas – tonearm tolerancing, motor power supplies, plinth
stiffening etc. For example, HIFICRITIC compared
and contrasted the RP3 and RP6
in Vol6 No2, and
found the more costly model clearly preferable.
However, this review goes to the top and most costly model in
Rega's relatively inexpensive range, the recently introduced £2,998 RP10
(or £3,598 complete with Rega's Apheta
low output moving-coil cartridge). (Our pre-production review
sample had a known software glitch in the motor drive, but with care we made
it work without much difficulty.) However, before describing the RP10
in detail, mention should also be made of the Naiad.
This player uses some very exotic and costly materials and construction
techniques, including advanced carbon fibre composites, and Rega is planning
to produce a limited number of Naiads
for sale (albeit at very high prices). But the prime purpose of creating such
a radical hi-tech prototype turntable was to act as a development tool,
setting sound quality and performance targets for the various RP-series
models.
Design
Philosophy
The RP10 might
not be a Naiad, but its design
draws heavily on the lessons learned with that prototype, while at the same
time being much simpler and less costly to build. Which is not to say it's
either cheap or simple, though it's certainly a lot less costly than many 'high
end' alternatives. The real question for this review must be whether this
comparatively inexpensive record player can deliver a sound quality
competitive with the very many much more costly and massive alternatives.
RP10 Details
The rest of the turntable has been designed to be as stiff and
as light as possible. Rega calls its construction 'skeletal', because of the
way all the important parts – motor, main bearing/hub and arm base – are
mounted on a irregularly-shaped open form. Constructed from a sandwich of
stressed phenolic skins above and below an ultra-light polyolefin foam core,
the vital mechanical connection between main hub and arm base is then further
reinforced by stiffening strips above (magnesium) and below (phenolic). The
whole structure is supported on three blunt rubber-tipped feet. It's actually
perfectly possible to play records on this curiously shaped structure (given a
tonearm, cartridge and power supply), but a particularly clever trick is that
this skeletal player also slots into place within the separate, conventional
looking plinth and cover that Rega supplies. It's a little like fitting a
(rather large) jigsaw piece into its puzzle outline. If the cover is kept
closed, this should help reduce feed through from the acoustic soundfield, as
well as keeping the dust off the platter. The plinth and cover also seem to be
entirely and rather effectively decoupled from the 'active' skeletal section,
so it's unlikely to couple any vibration even with the lid open. Very clever
indeed.
RB2000
Tonearm
The long established RB-series
of tonearms are unusual in combining headshell, arm wand and bearing housing
in a single alloy casting, to maximize mechanical integrity. Said casting was
recently redesigned to improve the mass distribution and reduce resonances and
stresses, though it has to be said that the only obvious visual difference
between the '1000 and '2000
lies in the latter's shinier finish and new lead-out cables. Tight
tolerances allow interference fits around the bearings, obviating any need for
adhesives. The chunky lead-out cables claim low capacitance and high
performance, and are fitted with good quality locking phono plugs.
Drive And
Supply
The main bearing is 'oiled for life', and drive is transmitted
to the hub from a very accurate CNC machined pulley via two neutral-coloured,
round section belts. Why two? Because this tends to smooth out any
irregularities found if just one is used.
Why neutral-coloured? Because adding colouring materials are
detrimental to sound quality. I spent some time chatting with Rega's Roy Gandy
about the ins and outs of belt design, materials and alternative manufacturing
techniques, and while this is arguably a little too arcane for repeating in a
review context, it did illustrate the lengths to which Rega goes in order to
refine every last detail.
Apheta
Cartridge
The new sample supplied with this turntable looks and performs
much the same as before. It has a transparent body (shaped more for strength
and to avoid parallel sides than for accurate lateral alignment during
installation, it must be said), so the physical alignment of the coils within
the magnetic field is clearly visible. This has the advantage in that the
correct tracking weight (or downforce) for each individual cartridge may be
easily and precisely defined by inspection, and the value is included in the
supplied data – our Apheta required 1.65g to give the correct internal coil
alignment. In the interests of improving cartridge-to-headshell mechanical
integrity, Rega uses three bolts in a tricycle configuration (which, however,
is incompatible with Linn's 'tail-wheel' approach). One point of criticism is
that the only protection for a rather exposed cantilever is a bent wire loop:
no proper stylus guard is provided, which is particularly significant here as
the stylus assembly is fixed.
Sound
Quality
Happily, auditioning immediately revealed the RP10's
strengths, as it seemed able to cut right through the vinyl medium in order to
bring fresh insights to the underlying recording and mastering processes. The
variations in recording quality between different discs was very obvious,
which means that the really great discs sound quite exceptional, though
sometimes recordings that had previously seemed quite acceptable can turn out
quite disappointing.
This made a re-exploration of my record collection both
mandatory and fascinating, bringing a succession of surprising insights.
Ironically (though perhaps not entirely unpredictably) some of the very best
recordings were some of the oldest, and I found that the greatest musical
pleasure came from relatively simple recordings, mostly made in the 1950s and
1960s, an era when recording technology was comparatively simple and
unintrusive. I wouldn't go so far as to state that all recent recordings are
poor, but this turntable did reveal rather too clearly some of the less
desirable aspects of modern practice. The main reason seemed to be the very
wide dynamic range, achieved in part by an exceptionally low noise floor, but
also by unusually vigorous dynamic expression, particularly through the broad
midband. Arguably even more important, however, is this record player's
superior timing and freedom from time-smear. This is where the undamped Apheta
cartridge slotted firmly into the overall package, and seemed to
suit the RP10 particularly well.
Damping is anathema to the Rega philosophy, because of the way
it interferes with the finely judged timing that is the very essence of
musical performance. It is of course the ability to manipulate time that for
me fundamentally distinguishes digital from analogue audio techniques, and
this record player's superior time-domain behaviour, especially with
pre-digital recordings, is a major factor that singles it out from the herd.
(It might also perhaps help explain why an increasing number of today's
consumers are returning to vinyl discs out of choice, and why Rega continues
to plough the analogue furrow.)
My record collection doesn't include a great deal of jazz
material, though I'm sure that numerous readers will share my great respect
for many of its 1950s and 1960s practitioners. This sort of material –
usually acoustic instruments playing live and recorded using relatively simple
techniques – often sounds quite superb when played on this vinyl spinner.
Move up to more recent recordings and much reissued material and one still
gets to enjoy some very fine musical performances, but these are frequently
overlaid by some arguably rather less desirable studio artefacts, so that the
musicians seem to be surrounded by an artificial 'tinge'. The result is quite
often musically entertaining, but doesn't exactly have 'reality' stamped all
over it.
I tried the RP10 in
a number of contexts, including taking it to MC's house and system, where it
performed very capably on his Finite Elemente support – notably fast and
dynamically expressive, if somewhat lacking in warmth and low bass compared to
MC's Koetsu- and Aro-equipped Linn. With hindsight, and after subsequently
trying alternatives when I got back home, I reckon much of the difference was
due to Rega's mildly idiosyncratic Apheta cartridge.
My Soundsmith strain gauge cartridge certainly sounded very different from the
Apheta when it was mounted in
the same record player, but (somewhat ironically) the best all round
compromise of bass weight, dynamics and timing was probably my venerable Linn Akiva
cartridge.
Conclusions
Specifications And Manufacturer
Contact:
Subscribe!
|
|