Home  |  Audio Reviews  Show Reports   Partner Mags  News 

 

March 2009
Enjoy the Music.com
Benchmark Media DAC1 PRE
You could spend more, yet doubt you can find one that performs better.
Review By Clarke Robinson

Click here to e-mail reviewer

 

Benchmark Media DAC1 PRE  Benchmark Media's DAC1 Digital/Analog Converter started winning awards in pro audio circles as early as 2002. Probably the first product available for under $1000 that made a successful attempt at conquering jitter...the last-remaining hurdle to truly musical digital audio... it has since gained an enormous following among both studios and budget-minded audiophiles.

Dick Olsher reviewed the original DAC1 back in 2005 (seen here) and since then, Benchmark released the DAC1 USB for the growing numbers of people turning to computer-based audio. The DAC1 has always doubled as a preamplifier, in that it has always had a volume knob that controls either or both the front panel headphone jacks and/or the analog outputs. The version under review here, the DAC1 PRE, introduced just last year, adds an analog input, bringing the DAC1 one step closer to being a full-featured preamplifier.

 

What's New On The PRE
Benchmark Media DAC1 PREThe various incarnations of the DAC1 are some of the most repeatedly reviewed audio products in the world, so I'll try not to delve too much into details that you can easily read at several other publications. The biggest changes to the outside of the DAC1 PRE are on the rear panel...gone are the XLR and BNC digital inputs on previous versions, replaced by a trio of coaxial inputs and, of course, a pair of unbalanced stereo inputs. Inside, OpAmps throughout the circuit have been upgraded to the National Semiconductor LM4562. This would seem a significant upgrade considering the LM4562s are almost 6x the price of the NE5532s used in previous DAC1s. However, Benchmark asserts that the DAC1 PRE doesn't sound any different than other DAC1 models, but the new OpAmps give the unit stability over a wider range of impedance loads.

 

The DAC1 PRE As A DAC
For much of the review period, I used the DAC1 PRE connected via coaxial S/PDIF to the Marantz SA8003 that I reviewed back in January and subsequently purchased. The Benchmark provided a clean, neutral sound that is probably as close to perfectly transparent as I will ever require in my system. It never failed to be a joy to listen to, and provided many fatigue-free hours of musical enjoyment over the course of the review period.

While I had the DAC1 PRE in my system, Analogue Productions released their first batch of Kevin Gray/Steve Hoffman remastered Blue Note titles. Of course, the main event here is that these are SACDs, but even the Redbook layer of John Coltrane's Blue Train provided a noticeable improvement over the 20-bit RVG remaster I already owned: "Philly" Joe Jones' cymbals rang out beautifully without a hint of digital hash, and Paul Chambers' bass sounded woody and palpable, as good as I've ever heard it. Kenny Drew's piano, well...still sounded like a Van Gelder piano, but Drew swings like mad nonetheless; and the dynamics and natural timbre in the horns brought them to punchy life in my living room.

I did a comparison of the SA8003 to a friend's DAC1 PRE in my review of the Marantz unit, however that session was fairly brief, and my impressions were a tad vague. With the DAC1 PRE at home in my own system I was able to spend many hours comparing the two, but that still didn't help clarify my opinion. Other than the fact that the Marantz played a touch louder than the Benchmark (in "calibrated" output mode), no sonic characteristics stood out consistently enough that I could differentiate between the two. Falling back onto hyper-subjective criteria that I'm not entirely comfortable reporting, I found that during casual listening sessions I preferred the Benchmark...I thought it presented a more lifelike and emotionally involving musical experience. However, during blind, level-matched comparisons I preferred the Marantz for exactly the same reasons.

I'm sure that hardcore proponents of the subjectivist and objectivist camps will each have their theories as to why this was the case, but for someone like myself, who has no dog in that particular fight, it is a puzzle. On one hand, evaluating an audio component based on my own emotional reactions to the music it plays makes sense, because the main reason many of us listen to music is for the effect it has on our emotions. On the other hand, those emotional reactions are...well, emotional; and I can't say with certainty that anyone in the world will have the same reactions I did. I am forced to conclude (either because it's true or because my system/ears are incapable of making the distinction) that the units sound similar enough that, if trying to make a purchase decision between the two, you can effectively eliminate Redbook performance as a criteria.

Of course, one of the great strengths of the DAC1 PRE and it's much-lauded jitter-rejection circuitry is not how great it sounds when used with a $1000 transport, but how great it sounds with a $100 (or less) transport. To test this, I connected the DAC1 PRE to a 15-year-old CD-ROM drive that I picked up on eBay for around $7 (an NEC MultiSpin 6xe, which happens to have a coaxial digital output built-in), and used a coat hanger for a digital interconnect. Seriously...a coat hanger. Anyway, I settled in for an afternoon of comparing this rather Mickey-Mouse setup to the Marantz/DAC1 combo. It only took a few tracks to realize that trying to find audible differences here was going to be as pointless as it was trying find them between the DAC1 PRE and the solo Marantz. I opted instead to spend the day enjoying a broad range of gorgeous, non-fatiguing, compellingly presented music, courtesy my $7 transport/coat hanger/DAC1 PRE combo, with all the dynamics, clarity of focus and inner detail that I had grown to expect from the Benchmark. Due to the unscientific nature of this "test", I can't guarantee that transport quality makes no difference to the sound of the DAC1 PRE, but I can say that it makes perfectly enjoyable, engaging music being driven by just about anything.

 

DAC1 Pre As A USB DAC
The USB input on the DAC1 PRE provides the best way I've found yet to connect my computer to the "big rig". The USB software in the DAC1 PRE is excellent... it can extract bit-perfect output from any of the popular operating systems, but works most seamlessly with Windows XP, which can dynamically adjust samples rates and bit depth to match the audio file being played, as long as your audio software is set up properly (Benchmark's website has a Wiki that is intended to help their customers keep up-to-date with the ever-shifting sands of software & OS versions).

I used the DAC1 PRE with a Dell Mini 9, bought refurbished from the Dell Outlet, fully decked-out and running Windows XP, for around $300. It is completely silent and small enough to fit neatly in my audio rack, but the 1024x600 pixel screen (combined with the audio player software of your choice) puts to shame the user-interface of every network audio player anywhere near it's price. I have it connected wirelessly to a 640MB drive shared on my main computer two rooms away, and it connected properly to the DAC1 PRE right out of the box (you know when Windows XP is working correctly with the DAC1 PRE when the volume slider in the "Sounds & Audio Devices" control panel is grayed out... Benchmark has nothing good to say about the impact digital volume controls have on an audio signal).

The Benchmark delivered the same articulate, mesmerizing performance with lossless digital files over USB that is did with Redbook. It did a fine job with MP3s as well, but seriously...if playing compressed, lossy audio is all you're doing with a computer in your system, the DAC1 PRE is probably overkill. Over the past few years, ECM Records has been distributing review copies of their new releases digitally to the press. These are available in a variety of formats, including uncompressed WAV files. One of their most intriguing releases of late was from American trumpet player/composer Jon Hassell, his first release on the label in over 20 years entitled Last night the moon came dropping its clothes in the street. Combining elements of world music and electronic experimentation into a rolling sonic landscape that unfolds slowly over the course of an hour, Hassell's is a unique voice. The album presents an enormously wide soundstage at times, with a myriad infinitesimal details coming at you from all directions that are as gorgeously recorded by Manfred Eicher as they were exquisitely rendered on the DAC1 PRE.

What I really wanted to hear on the DAC1 PRE, however, was some of the new 24-bit/96kHz downloads that are becoming available from HDtracks, Linn Records, and others. I bought high-resolution files from HDtracks of a few albums that have been reference favorites of mine for years: McCoy Tyner's New York Reunion and Portraits of Cuba by Paquito D'Rivera. HDtracks recommends using a free program called MediaMonkey for its high-res FLAC files. I tried it, but found it had an unsatisfactory way of dealing with gaps between tracks, so I ditched it in favor of Foobar2000... an open-source app that is about as bare-bones as they come. It worked perfectly, and is highly configurable: almost 200 plug-ins are available that do anything from improving the UI to installing an ABX comparator.

Tyner was up first, and sounded as good as ever. I can't say the 24-bit/96kHz files brought anything new to the table I hadn't already heard a hundred times on the Redbook release, but it did show that these high-res downloads are a fine way to go for those looking to ditch shiny discs altogether. Portraits of Cuba was a somewhat different story. The high-res download sounded spectacular... involving & groovy; the SACD version I own came across slightly less rhythmic, but more detailed... slowed down, in a way. Not actually slower, the 5:14 set opening "La Bella Cubana" took 5:14 to get through anywhere I played it, but D'Rivera's solos played in a way that seemed to invite close examination. I have no idea if this was to do with DSD vs. PCM, or simply how SACDs are presented on the Marantz, but the sounds of the two were more different than they were better or worse. Either way, the DAC1 PRE made a strong showing of the high-res downloads...good news for those of us who feared that the advent of digital downloads marked the beginning of the end of hi-fi.

 

DAC1 PRE As A Preamplifier
The DAC1 PRE makes for a clean, transparent preamplifier that gets well out of the way of the music. I only set it up as a preamp for one day, since my own pre (the Parasound Model 2100) is also clean, transparent and has no real sound "signature" of its own, a detailed comparison didn't seem worth the effort. For those who like their coloration from other links in the chain (or none at all), the DAC1 PRE could serve you well.

While the obvious weaknesses of the DAC1's preamplifier function (only one input and no remote control) make it seem like the Benchmark engineers are die-hard minimalists, it's not really the case. There isn't a remote-enabled (i.e. motorized) volume pot on the market that will fit in their trademark half-rack enclosure, nor is there an electronic volume control available anywhere that performs to their distortion-free standards. A quick look at the rear panel of the DAC1 PRE clearly demonstrates there isn't any room for a single additional input (although personally, I'd happily give up two of the three coaxial digital inputs for a 2nd set of analog RCAs). Solving these issues would require a larger enclosure, and the tooling/inventory costs of such a thing could have a huge impact on the affordability of the DAC1 PRE.

 

Buying Advice
At $1595, the Benchmark DAC1 PRE is not an inexpensive unit (at least not by my standards), but that it does everything that it does as well as it does, and does it all in a such a small box practically makes it a miracle of engineering. If your system is such that you could take advantage of it's preamplifier capability (and it's not hard to imagine such a system), it's really quite a bargain.

Of course, Benchmark's biggest strength is the digital performance in all of the DAC1 products. You can obviously spend more on a digital front end, but it's debatable that you could find one that performs better, especially where a neutral, uncolored sound is preferred. From a performance perspective, the DAC1 PRE gets my highest recommendation. Practically speaking, there's no shame in saving a few hundred bucks getting one of the earlier DAC1 models (the DAC-only DAC1 and DAC1 USB are both still available) if you don't need the additional functionality. Benchmark has scored a major home run with the the DAC1 series, and any one could satisfy for years to come.

 

Associated Equipment
Ascend Sierra-1 stand-mounted loudspeakers
Marantz SA8003
Parasound Model 2100 Preamplifier
Parasound Model 2125 Amplifier
Listening room is approximately 13 feet wide and 25 feet long.
Acoustic treatments include wall-wall carpet, curtains, and a large overstuffed sofa.

 

Tonality

Sub-bass (10Hz - 60Hz)

Mid-bass (80Hz - 200Hz)

Midrange (200Hz - 3,000Hz)

High Frequencies (3,000Hz On Up)

Attack

Decay

Inner Resolution

Soundscape Width Front

Soundscape Width Rear  
Soundscape Depth Behind Speakers

Soundscape Extension Into Room

Imaging

Fit And Finish

Self Noise

Value For The Money

 

Specifications
Type: D/A Converter with Preamplifier Functions and USB Input
Digital Inputs: Three Coaxial, one Toslink, and one USB
Input Sample Frequency Range: 28kHz to 195kHz (Coaxial & Toslink); 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96 kHz (USB)
Maximum Input Word Length: 24 bits
Digital Input Impedance on Coaxial Input: 75 ohms or Hi-Z (Bridging)
Analog Input Impedance: 20k ohms
Output Impedance: 30 ohms (unbalanced), 60 ohms (balanced)
Dimensions: 9.33 x 9.5 x 1.725 (DxWxH in inches)
Weight: 3.5 lbs.
Price: $1595

 

Company Information
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc. 
203 East Hampton Place 
Suite 2 
Syracuse, NY 13206

Voice: (800) 262-4675
Website: www.benchmarkmedia.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Quick Links


Audiophile Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews

Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Preamplifiers
Amplifiers
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc

Superior Audio Archives
Ultra High-End Audio Reviews

Videos
Musician Series
Enjoy the Music.TV

Music Reviews
Classical Music
Jazz, Bluegrass, Blues, Etc.
Rock, Pop, Techno, Metal, Etc.

Columns
Editorials By Tom Lyle
Editorials By Steven R. Rochlin
Viewpoint By Roger Skoff
Audiolics Anonymous
Nearfield By Steven Stone
Various Think Pieces
Manufacturer Articles


Partner Magazines
The Absolute Sound
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
NOVO (CANADA HiFi)
hi-fi+ Magazine
HIFICRITIC
HiFi Media
Hi-Fi World
Sound Practices
VALVE Magazine

Show Reports
LAAS 2017 Show Report
High End Munich 2017 Show Report
AXPONA 2017 Show Report
CanJam SoCal 2017 Show Report
Montreal Audio Fest 2017 Show Report
CanJam NYC 2017 Report
CES 2017 Show Report & Videos
TAVES 2016 Toronto Show Report
Rocky Mountain Audio Fest 2016
CanJam 2016 Denver RMAF
Audio Engineering Society 141 LA
CanJam London 2016 Show Report
Hong Kong AV Show Report 2016
Capital Audiofest 2016
Click here for previous shows.

Resources And Information
Music Definitions
Hi-Fi Definitions
High-End Audio Manufacture Links

 


Daily Industry News

High-End Audio News & Information

Internet Browser
Audiophile Internet Browser V12

Mobile Phone Apps
Android Audiophile App

Other
Audiophile Contests
Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty
300B Tube Comparison

For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics

Contests & Join Our Mailing List

Our free newsletter for monthly updates & enter our contests!

Our Social Media & Video Channel
     

 

 

     

Home  |  Sitemap  |  Industry News  |  Equipment / Music Reviews  |  Press Releases  |  About Us  |  Contact Us

 

All contents copyright  1995 - 2017  Enjoy the Music.com
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.