Home  |  Audio Reviews  Show Reports   Partner Mags  News 

December 2011

Rollin’s Twin-T Notch Filter
Taming those devious evil lower frequencies. 
Article By Grey Rollins

Difficulty Level

   

 

  I confess to having a bit of an evil sense of humor. I once had a stereo buddy who was obsessed with his listening room. In a sense, he was ahead of his time, because this was long enough ago that few people paid attention to such things and you couldn't just order room treatment panels off the internet... because there were no panels and there was no Web/Internet, and wouldn't be for years. He managed to work himself into a bit of a lather over room resonances and all I heard about for months was how he thought that he had a resonance at this frequency or that, and to be honest, it got a bit tedious. Being of a wicked bent, I decided to test his mental stability.

In those days I worked with mainframe computers, so I took a few minutes and wrote a program in PL/1 (I told you this was a long time ago) that calculated the resonance modes in his room. All of them. From the lowest mode his room would support up to some arbitrarily high limit — I forget what, probably 5 kHz or 10 kHz.

Pages and pages of the old-fashioned green bar computer paper, printed at 8 lines to the inch (that being as tight as you could space the print). When I handed it to my friend, his eyes lit up — he thought I was handing him an officially computer-calculated solution to his problem. As the realization dawned that it was no solution; that I had actually damned him to one of the Seven Levels of Audio Hell, his face fell. I then helpfully pointed out that the problem was even worse than that...  that the modes went from the front wall to the back wall, from side wall to side wall, and from floor to ceiling. In short, his room was a three dimensional waffle of pulsing, seething, ever-changing nodes of energy.

And you know what? It cured him of his obsession. (Which is what I'd secretly hoped all along.) Once he got all that jittery, frittery nervousness out of the way, he buckled down and started working on the real problems, which were actually far fewer in numbers than you might suppose. Why? Because most rooms only have two or three resonances that are significant; all the rest just kinda fade into insignificance.

Here's the deal: The ones you have to worry about are the ones that persist long enough to be noticed. It is one thing to have a resonance that's relatively low Q (see the last two articles for a little more about Q), because the resonance doesn't last long enough to be a problem. The annoying ones are higher Q and persist like the ringing of a bell — or perhaps a better analogy would be a large, low frequency gong. Let us simplify matters by ignoring anything over, say, 200Hz. Yes, there's a lot of hash up there, but it's more appropriate to deal with that sort of thing by using room treatments. Egad, back in the day, we had to use thick curtains and upholstery foam. Now you can buy nifty stuff that actually looks nice and performs much more consistently.

Low frequencies present more of a challenge because, well, because they're lower.

Uh...right. Wanna beer with that tautology?

Don't mind if I do.

The problem arises because low frequencies have longer wavelengths. How long? Well, a 20 Hz tone has a wavelength of 56 feet. A 200 Hz tone is somewhat more manageable, at 5.6 feet. The wavelength is important because your ability to tame a rogue wave is defined by how much absorptive material you can throw at it. A 20 kHz wave is less than an inch long. You can pretty much quell any problems there by putting up a half-inch thick piece of foam with pretty fabric stretched over it. A 56 foot wavelength laughs at such puny efforts. It zips right through the absorptive material, bounces off the wall behind it, and comes roaring back past you, headed for the opposite wall. And if you have the misfortune to have a room proportioned such that a floor-to-ceiling resonance happens at that same frequency, then you've got double trouble. If you've got one from side-to-side at the same time, you're going to be plumb miserable.

So how do you determine where the potential resonances are? By plugging the dimensions of your room into a simple formula:

Resonance frequency = 1125 / (2 x Length)

So, for example, let us say your listening room is 20 feet long, from front to back. Two times that is 40, and 1125 (the speed of sound) divided by that is a little over 28 Hz. Now, that's the lowest frequency you have to worry about, at least between those two walls. Anything below that is compression, which is something you can feel, but the room isn't long enough to properly allow the wavelength to develop. (Car stereo folks spend a lot of time thinking about compression, given that average-sized car interiors won't allow real bass below 100Hz or so.) Above that first resonance, you're going to see more resonance modes at integer multiples of 28 Hz, so expect potential problems at 56, 84, 112 Hz, etc.

So why only 'potential' problems? Why aren't all these frequencies driving you crazy at the same time? Because some of the energy goes right through the wall to drive your neighbors nuts. Some gets absorbed by the 2" x 4" studs and wallboard that make up the wall itself. And so forth. You can't just calculate and say that you will definitely, positively, absolutely have a problem at 28Hz. Real listening rooms are not that simple. For instance, take the vertical dimension. Here in the United States, the vast majority of ceilings are eight feet from the floor. That means that nearly everyone will have a potential resonance mode at 70 Hz. But those who have sloped ceilings in their listening rooms (aka cathedral ceilings) will have no vertical problems at all. Resonances only occur between parallel walls. Another thing you sometimes see is an open archway into a hall or another room. That reduces the severity of the standing wave since the amount of wall at a given distance is reduced; the arch is going to give you a different effective room length, hence a different resonant frequency.

Incidentally, these two concepts, non-parallel walls and staggered walls, are extremely effective at reducing or even eliminating resonances, but if your listening room wasn't built that way to begin with, you're going to have to do some serious (and expensive) reworking of your household. Hint: A very effective cheat, at least for mid and high frequencies, is lots of bookshelves full of lots and lots of books. The rounded spines reflect incident sound waves in myriad directions. Where isn't important, just so long as it isn't towards the opposite wall.

Note that this is a splendid reason to keep all those old-fashioned real books. Kindles and Nooks won't perform this function for you.

But let us suppose that you've got a resonance problem in your listening room and you were silly enough to give away all your Harry Potter books when you got your Kindle. What can you do?

When faced with a Norwegian Ridgeback (that's a type of dragon, for those unfamiliar with the Harry Potter universe), it's best not to poke it in the eye with a sharp stick. Similarly, when your listening room has a resonance, it is best just not to excite it in the first place. If you reduce the amount of energy going into your listening room at the resonant frequency, the resonance will not ring. If you're sufficiently clever, you can reduce the energy just the right amount to produce flat response. Okay, that sounds reasonable. How do you go about doing it?

The answer is a notch filter. A notch filter reduces — or even knocks out entirely — a narrow frequency band from a wider bandwidth signal. They're quite useful, really, and find application in things like taking out 60 Hz hums and annoying high-pitched whistles in recordings. (I once had a fellow in an unhappy relationship ask me for the values to notch out his whiny girlfriend's voice — discretion being the greater part of valor; I made myself scarce until the storm blew over...)

Click here to see Insert Twin-T notch filter schematic.

Your garden variety Twin-T notch filter is a fairly simple circuit. For convenience, I've put the filter between two JFET buffers (V1 and V2 allow you to adjust DC offset). Feel free to improvise on the buffers — there is nothing sacred about them. Indeed, many folks use chip OpAmps arranged as voltage followers. The idea is to keep the filter and the outside world at arm's-length from one another.

There are two branches to the circuit. The upper one, R4, R6, and C2, is a low pass filter. The lower one, C1, C3, and R5, is a high pass filter. That's it. The formula is:

F = 1/(2*PI*R*C)

Where F is the notch frequency, R is the resistance, and C is the capacitance in Farads. Note that C2 is twice the value of C in the formula, and R5 is half the value of R in the formula. R4, R6, C1, and C3 are the straight values as calculated. The values shown will give a notch at about 160Hz. If you want to make the Q of the circuit somewhat variable, use a dual pot to vary R4 and R6 at the same time. The textbooks insist that the values of the components be matched to a fare-thee-well, but their goal is as near infinite attenuation as possible. For this application, the Q doesn't need to be anywhere near infinite, and most times you'll find that a Q of 2 to 5 or so will be quite adequate.

Click here to see Bootstrapped Twin-T filter schematic.

A variation on that circuit uses a technique called bootstrapping to sharpen up the knees of the filter's response. The circuit is identical, except for the addition of a third buffer that allows for some of the output signal being fed back to the ground point in the middle of the filter. The erstwhile ground point now follows the signal, rather than being tied to a hard reference. Every time the signal moves, "ground" moves with it. The pot, V4, allows you to adjust the amount of signal fed back to the filter, which changes the Q.

If you feel that you want a variable frequency design, the circuit can be rearranged somewhat:

Click here to see Tunable notch filter schematic.

In this circuit, V2 tunes the frequency of the notch, and V3 allows for tuning the Q of the circuit. The notch frequency for this circuit is given by:                      

_____________________________________________________________________

1/(2*PI*C*√3*(total resistance to the left of V2's wiper)*(total resistance to the right of V2's wiper))

 

As a general starting point, the sum of R5 and V3 should be about six times the sum of R4, V2 and R6. The values given will give the circuit a frequency range from roughly 30 to 200 Hz.

This leaves hanging the question of how to tell where you need your notch filters. Modern technology comes to the rescue in the guise of your AV receiver. These days, it's become common to have a setup program in the receiver that executes an analysis of the acoustics of your listening room. If yours doesn't have such a circuit, ask around — chances are someone you know has a receiver that will do the job. Although the audio electronics in AV receivers aren't equivalent to high end stereo componentry, there's no reason you can't use an AV receiver as a test instrument. Once it determines where you need filters, you can remove it and put it back to use decoding the footfalls of dinosaurs and exploding planets, where it belongs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Quick Links


Audiophile Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews

Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Preamplifiers
Amplifiers
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc

Superior Audio Archives
Ultra High-End Audio Reviews

Videos
Musician Series
Enjoy the Music.TV

Music Reviews
Classical Music
Jazz, Bluegrass, Blues, Etc.
Rock, Pop, Techno, Metal, Etc.

Columns
Editorials By Tom Lyle
Editorials By Steven R. Rochlin
Viewpoint By Roger Skoff
Audiolics Anonymous
Nearfield By Steven Stone
Various Think Pieces
Manufacturer Articles


Partner Magazines
The Absolute Sound
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
NOVO (CANADA HiFi)
hi-fi+ Magazine
HIFICRITIC
HiFi Media
Hi-Fi World
Sound Practices
VALVE Magazine

Show Reports
Capital Audiofest (CAF) 2017 CanMania
Rocky Mountain Audio Fest 2017
CanJam 2017 Denver RMAF
LAAS 2017 Show Report
High End Munich 2017 Show Report
AXPONA 2017 Show Report
CanJam SoCal 2017 Show Report
Montreal Audio Fest 2017 Show Report
CanJam NYC 2017 Report
CES 2017 Show Report & Videos
TAVES 2016 Toronto Show Report
T.H.E. Show Newport 2016
Audio Engineering Society 141 LA
CanJam London 2016 Show Report
Hong Kong AV Show Report 2016
Click here for previous shows.

Resources And Information
Music Definitions
Hi-Fi Definitions
High-End Audio Manufacture Links

 


Daily Industry News

High-End Audio News & Information

Internet Browser
Audiophile Internet Browser V12

Mobile Phone Apps
Android Audiophile App

Other
Audiophile Contests
Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty
300B Tube Comparison

For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics

Contests & Join Our Mailing List

Our free newsletter for monthly updates & enter our contests!

Our Social Media & Video Channel
     

 

 

     

Home  |  Sitemap  |  Industry News  |  Equipment / Music Reviews  |  Press Releases  |  About Us  |  Contact Us

 

All contents copyright©  1995 - 2017  Enjoy the Music.com®
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.