Home  |  Audio Reviews  Show Reports   Partner Mags  News 

November 2011

Subwoofer Lowpass Filter II
Using OpAmps and other parts for best results.
Article By Grey Rollins

Difficulty Level

   

 

  Whew! Halloween's past. Hopefully we can put Ol' Scratch behind us and get back to more innocent pursuits. As promised, there are more ways than one to skin the proverbial cat. Last time I described how to use a low pass filter to extend the bass response of a speaker or subwoofer (see previous article here). You can accomplish the same thing with a high pass filter, although as you might imagine, the details differ. Using a low pass filter with a subwoofer doesn't seem all that outlandish — after all, you need one to divide the frequencies between the main speakers and the subwoofer. But a high pass...? From reading posts here and there around the web and from conversations with people, it seems that it's a bit of a conceptual hurdle. After all, a high pass, by design, rolls off the low end. Isn't that the opposite of what you want?

Well, yes... and no...

If the filter was a standard Butterworth maximally flat design, then there would be no benefit to placing a high pass in the signal path. But the words 'maximally flat' constitute a loophole of sufficient size to coax an elephant through. The trick is that there's a parameter called Q, short for quality factor, which describes how peaky the response is right before the rolloff point. Honestly, I've never been all that fond of calling it peaky, because half the curves out there are anything but. I defy anyone to look at a curve with Q = 0.4 and point to a 'peak' anywhere in the thing, but that's the term you see when you read about filters so we're stuck with it.

Mathematically, Q is the ratio between the width of a peak and its amplitude. The higher the Q, the more peaked it is. A Butterworth filter — that is the ordinary sort of filter that you're used to seeing — has a Q of 0.707, which means that as you approach the the rolloff point, the response stays flat up until the last possible instant before beginning the slope; hence “maximally flat.” But Q can be anything. It's not all that remarkable to have filters with really sharp peaks that measure in tens or hundreds when you're dealing with things like tuned radio frequency circuits. Fortunately for us, audio circuits deal with much milder figures, as that sort of behavior can lead to instability if you're not careful.

While we're at it, yes, there are Qs lower than 0.707, but they go soft as they approach the rolloff point, melting slowly away even before they get to the official rolloff. Indeed, it is not always apparent to the eye exactly where the rolloff is (hint: it's still the -3dB level). For present purposes however, we need to look at Qs greater than 0.707, so I am forced to admit that the term peaky turns out to be useful after all — at least for this circuit. A filter with a Q greater than 0.707 actually exhibits a rising response as it approaches the rolloff point. How much rise? Depends on the Q, of course, but a Q of 2.0 gives you a peak about 6dB or so above the pass band response (the term pass band refers to the flat part of the filter's response curve, where the filter has no effect) and that's a pretty good place to start in our quest to enhance bass response.

So what will a 6dB boost in the low end get you? Let's say that you've got a speaker that's -3dB at 40Hz. Assuming that the speaker is a textbook maximally flat sort of speaker, then you would expect the response to be down 6dB in the mid to low-30Hz range. So for starters set the 6dB peak in the response curve for the point where the speaker is down 6dB, thus boosting the speaker back to flat response. By the time the speaker and boost circuit are down 3dB again, you're in the mid-20Hz region, so in practical terms you've gained nearly an octave of low end extension.

If you're willing to accept a little wobble in your response curve, you can set the circuit for even lower frequencies. There will be a slight dip — how much depends on exactly where you set the filter — as the speaker begins to rolloff, followed by recovery to nearly flat response, then the final slope downwards. It is easy to devise a circuit that will boost response by ten or twenty dB, but the aforementioned stability problems tend to make life difficult so it's best to stay below Q = 2, or perhaps 3 at most. An extra octave of low end is nothing to sneer at. If you feel that you need more boost over a wider frequency range, then you might want to consider the low pass circuit I outlined last time. This circuit gives you finer control over a somewhat narrower range. It's all about having options and the more circuits you have in your toolbox, the more things you can try when faced with wimpy bass.

Click here to see schematic.

This circuit is a mirror image of the low pass filter we used last time. The resistors and capacitors have swapped places. I've included more frequency options so you can try a variety of corner frequencies quickly and easily. Simply jumper between the dots to select the frequency that you want. The Q settings in the lower right corner are the star of the show, however. The Q = 1 and Q = 2 settings will be the most useful. Feel free to experiment with intermediate values between 10k and 25.5k, as there's no magic to whole numbers. There's no reason not to use a 20k pot in series with a 10k fixed resistor. The resistor will keep you from going below 10k and the pot will give you infinite variability from Q = 2 down to a little over 0.707. Going much lower than 10k in this circuit can be risky. Besides, going much over 2 will tend to give you “one note bass” due to having a pronounced frequency peak over a very narrow frequency range. Real world speakers will rarely, if ever, have such a narrow, deep suckout that a really narrow, sharp boost is called for.

For this application, setting the Q to 0.707 defeats the purpose of the circuit in that there will be no bass boost. I included the resistor so you could switch the boost in and out for A-B comparison. Alternatively, you could adjust the values of the crossover resistors and use the circuit as a normal high pass Butterworth crossover. The Q = 0.577 resistor allows you to take a bit of bass out of the frequency response. Many speakers — the Rogers LS 3/5a being a famous example — use a slightly elevated Q to give the subjective impression of more bass. In this case the slightly depressed Q of the circuit, balanced against the elevated Q of the speaker, can be used to restore flat response. You have more latitude in terms of resistor values when working with Qs below 0.707 so tweak to your heart's content. Again, a pot in series with a fixed resistor might be more convenient.

Whatever you do, do not switch the resistance with the circuit live. This will effectively set the resistance to infinity and lose your ground reference. If you want to play with the values while listening, a pot is your safest bet. Otherwise turn the circuit off, select a resistor value, then turn it back on. If you want to spend a few minutes with a calculator you can use a default resistor value that's always in the circuit, in parallel with higher, selectable resistor values. That way the default resistor will maintain ground reference.

Like last time, you have the option of setting the two banks of frequency selection resistors separately if you like. Some really interesting EQ slopes can be achieved this way, but for most people, most of the time, the ticket will be to choose like resistor values. This will give you textbook slopes with easily predictable responses. All the disclaimers from last time still apply. The devil is still in the details. If you're not careful, you can exceed the excursion capabilities of your woofers. This is not going to make your woofer manufacturer happy and they will not cover the damage under warranty. Yes, they will know. Burned voice coils and crushed coil formers are pretty distinctive failure modes. This will make you unhappy. In addition, boosting the bass will require more power from your amplifier. You have been warned.

Naturally, if you're bi-amping you'll need a low pass filter to complete the crossover. See the low pass circuit from last time. You'll find that it's better to place the low pass first, followed by the high pass. That way the low pass limits the amplitude of the signal going into the boost part of the circuit. It also reduces the chance of overloading the low pass by feeding it a boosted signal.

Yet another take on the bass boost circuit is available on Siegfried Linkwitz's website. If you scroll down nearly to the bottom of his homepage, he offers a reprint of an article he published back in 1978 using active crossovers to drive a three way system. The woofer section includes a boost circuit. He follows a similar philosophy today. He employs a bit more electronics in the signal path than I'm comfortable with, but it's a tried and true solution and he's spent years fine tuning it. You can also — assuming that you've built your own speakers — change the Q of the (sub)woofers themselves by varying the size of the cabinet. Reducing the cabinet volume increases the Q; increasing it lowers the Q. Ideally, there's a happy medium somewhere in the middle where you can achieve a maximally flat tuning. You will not always be able to find that perfect spot. The driver itself may not be flat, your significant other may object to a cabinet that's large enough to do the job, there may be resonances in the speaker cabinet or room.

Wait a minute...

There's a circuit for that.

Next time we'll address ways to tame resonances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Quick Links


Audiophile Review Magazine
High-End Audio Equipment Reviews

Equipment Review Archives
Turntables, Cartridges, Etc
Digital Source
Do It Yourself (DIY)
Preamplifiers
Amplifiers
Cables, Wires, Etc
Loudspeakers/ Monitors
Headphones, IEMs, Tweaks, Etc

Superior Audio Archives
Ultra High-End Audio Reviews

Videos
Musician Series
Enjoy the Music.TV

Music Reviews
Classical Music
Jazz, Bluegrass, Blues, Etc.
Rock, Pop, Techno, Metal, Etc.

Columns
Editorials By Tom Lyle
Editorials By Steven R. Rochlin
Viewpoint By Roger Skoff
Audiolics Anonymous
Nearfield By Steven Stone
Various Think Pieces
Manufacturer Articles


Partner Magazines
The Absolute Sound
Australian Hi-Fi Magazine
NOVO (CANADA HiFi)
hi-fi+ Magazine
HIFICRITIC
HiFi Media
Hi-Fi World
Sound Practices
VALVE Magazine

Show Reports
LAAS 2017 Show Report
High End Munich 2017 Show Report
AXPONA 2017 Show Report
CanJam SoCal 2017 Show Report
Montreal Audio Fest 2017 Show Report
CanJam NYC 2017 Report
CES 2017 Show Report & Videos
TAVES 2016 Toronto Show Report
Rocky Mountain Audio Fest 2016
CanJam 2016 Denver RMAF
Audio Engineering Society 141 LA
CanJam London 2016 Show Report
Hong Kong AV Show Report 2016
Capital Audiofest 2016
Click here for previous shows.

Resources And Information
Music Definitions
Hi-Fi Definitions
High-End Audio Manufacture Links

 


Daily Industry News

High-End Audio News & Information

Internet Browser
Audiophile Internet Browser V12

Mobile Phone Apps
Android Audiophile App

Other
Audiophile Contests
Cool Free Stuff For You
Tweaks For Your System
Vinyl Logos For LP Lovers
Lust Pages Visual Beauty
300B Tube Comparison

For The Press & Industry
About Us
Press Releases
Official Site Graphics

Contests & Join Our Mailing List

Our free newsletter for monthly updates & enter our contests!

Our Social Media & Video Channel
     

 

 

     

Home  |  Sitemap  |  Industry News  |  Equipment / Music Reviews  |  Press Releases  |  About Us  |  Contact Us

 

All contents copyrightฉ  1995 - 2017  Enjoy the Music.com
May not be copied or reproduced without permission.  All rights reserved.