Fall 2009

Merrill DCA 4 And The Zigmahornet
Article By Jeff Poth
Difficulty Level

Ah VSAC… land of the true
audio nerds like me for those us for whom buying gear isn't enough. We
need to build it, tinker with it, and understand the fundamentals of why
it works. Being a devoted audio nerd, I made my way up to VSAC in May of
2008 to cover the show for Enjoy the Music.com (see
report here) and exercise my nerdiness and perhaps find a couple
things to review (like these Zigmahornets, and the Occam
Audio MTM4. Indeed, if you're reading this, you've likely
started on the path to true Nerdism but fear not, you don't need a 12
step program. DIY has the lovely characteristic of being able to enjoy
things for what they are, rather than what they're not. Something that a
person builds will tend to be viewed in a rather more positive light, if
only for the characteristics that make it unique.
And, unique is what the Zigmahornets are. The
Zigmahornet is the recommended enclosure for the Merrill DCA4, a small
(4.5") full range driver as seen above. They are quite affordable at $65
a pair, well built, and well suited for the cabinet in question.
It is an acoustic labyrinth, AKA unstuffed
transmission line, or quarter-wave resonator. This enclosure type tends
to offer extra bass extension and some reduction in cone excursion vs. a
sealed box, and a wider operating bandwidth from the vent than a
bass-reflex. On the downside, there are issues with resonances above the
intended frequency range (see the ripples on the impedance curve near
the bottom of this article), and the contributions to the overall output
are delayed relative to the frontwave. This is known as group delay and
it has variable audibility based upon frequency, level, and listener.
The tall, slender cabinet has some plusses and
minuses. On the upside, there is a low amount of edge diffraction from
this cabinet type. Between this, the tiny panel width, and the
point-source speaker, these are destined to be imaging champions (and
indeed, they are). On the downside, such a slender baffle means that the
transition to 4pi radiation (aka. Baffle Step) takes place at quite a
high frequency, which can thin out the bass frequencies up into the
midrange. Some may wish to modify the front baffle with extensions to
help this, or place the speakers close to a wall. More on these issues
later.
The construction is straightforward woodwork, and the
result is extremely elegant. The only part that might give some problems
is the angled top section. They're all 45 degrees, though, so if you can
work a saw (you could manage these with a circular saw, table saw, or
even a handsaw), you can build them.

It's a well known fact that you can never have too
many clamps.
They're gorgeous with an extremely high WAF (Wife
Approval Factor). They were built with the recommended 0.5" ply, and I
painted them rather than wood finish.

You can see my preferred primer, Zinsser "BIN" shellac
based white primer, peeking out from the brown. This is during the
sanding phase.
There is a small amount of felt on the inside walls
near the driver, and no bracing, per the plans. I did a 0.5" roundover
on all edges, though in this application, it should be acoustically
irrelevant (the driver is highly directional lower in frequency than a
˝" roundover is effective). Speakers are hardwired with some high
quality 2 conductor copper speaker cable.
On the downside, they're very prone to tipping. Even
with a 1.75" base plate, these tall lightweights are very tippy on my
carpet, even with outrigger spikes. Those of you with little kids,
beware. I have had to do many touch-ups on my paintjob. Indeed, it
reached critical mass with a knockover cracking one of the pipe sections
off the base.

Fortunately, it re-glued fairly easily. I was forced
to go the route of making additional ‘sub bases' for them after all
finishing had initially been completed, which was a lot of work, but did
give me the opportunity to practice the veneering I'll be doing on my
next full-range project.


More work than the construction of the speaker. I cannot
emphasize enough that you must oversize the base. The overall size here
is 9 1/16" x 14 1/16" x 2 15/16". Go thick, go heavy, and then add a
little bit.
First System "The Big Rig"
The sound is a challenging question in this
room. I'd heard these at VSAC with a pair of small complementary woofers
and they did quite well in that small room, prompting discussion of a
write-up. Those who know me know I'm a bass fiend. These are not bass
fiend speakers (as anyone should be able to tell you from looking at
them). I expect "correct" quantity at very high quality. I'm no
headbanger, I listen at modest levels usually, but my expectations are
very low distortion and very good extension. This has often meant
multiple subs for reduced room interaction (my last subs would have been
perfect for these, shame I gave them away!).
On
the plus side, at modest levels, they're very good at imaging, and with
simple music, they're fantastic. Upper midrange dynamics are superb,
with cymbal crashes and the like portrayed excellently. Bass extension
is very light, and treble extension is ‘just enough', but I'm a man
who likes my frequency extremes, which is not a strength of
single-driver speakers. The midrange is pleasant, clear, and tonally
complete.
For the negatives, they're very limited in their
ability to play loud, especially in the bass. When you ask prolonged
moderately high levels of them, they are very fatiguing. They obviously
need more help. Even with the sub kicking along, they're not able to
come anywhere near the levels they'll need to through the midbass. This
room is probably the bulk of the issue, as my main listening is done in
a big room with extremely little reinforcement as it is open to other
rooms.
I cannot recommend these to anyone with a large room,
or those who enjoy "live" levels even in a smaller room. For those
users, if they want full-range goodness, I'd recommend they go to a 6.5"
or 8" full-range, and/or a horn-loaded cabinet rather than a quarterwave
design. Another solution is to use a less sensitive, higher Xmax driver,
though more Xmax isn't always the end-all solution (or even desirable
from a driver design perspective) but it certainly would have prevented
the distortion characteristics I noted at higher levels.
Second System, Smaller Room
Given the level and complexity and bass
limitations of a larger room, these were then auditioned in a smaller,
bedroom environment. I hooked them up to a Bottlehead Enhanced SEX amp
and had at it. I used a Marantz Laserdisc player for movie watching in
this system, and a Roku M500 to stream .flac music from my music server
directly. For those who don't know, .flac is a lossless compression
scheme for storing music collections. These are typically served by
Squeezebox, Sonos, or other similar devices (like the Roku), streaming
music from a computer music server to the stereo.
At first, even in this smaller space, there was
insufficient bass, at any playback level. So, a tiny subwoofer was
brought into the mix. Opposed 8" woofers and a 600W plate amp is plenty
to do some very good reasonably deep bass, given the small room and
level limitations. The first iteration of the setup had this situated
between the Zigmahornets, which were only about 3' apart and me
typically listening from 4-5 feet, so a fairly nearfield setup. Once I
broke away from nearfield, the mid-bass thinned out. Accordingly, the
best setup seemed to require some boundary reinforcement. By getting
them closer to the TV, I was able to use the screen as a baffle
extension to fill the gap between the sub and the upper bass. If you
wanted to use a larger front baffle, that could help, or some people use
an inductor-resistor in parallel (in series with the driver. 3 ohms and
.8mH would be decent starting values for this speaker) to correct for "baffle
step" loss in a single driver speaker.
The advantages of single drivers are readily apparent
in this configuration, with a clarity and coherency that are very
impressive. As in the "big rig", the lower treble/upper mids are superb,
without any of the harshness that was audible in the big system. This
can be attributed to the lack of output requirements in this sort of
arrangement. Less cone motion equates to less distortion. The SEX amp
really played well with these, making very enjoyable music, but there
was still a sense of output limitation. This I attributed to the mere
watt and a half available from the 6DN7 wanting just a little more than
the 90 or so dB the Zigmas had to offer. The imaging and soundstaging
was world-class.
Some
experimentation with other amplifiers improved some things, but
ultimately, the Bottlehead SEX amp was the best match, limitations and
all. These are not ‘big' speakers, these are intimate speakers. They're
not for bassheads, they're for reasonable levels and requirements. And
in that task, they excel. Small ensembles, jazz, rock, other music are
well served, even without a subwoofer. Add a sub to the mix, and things
get more flexible, but these aren't party speakers, even with a good
sub. It is important to note, however, that these will work with a wide
variety of amps. They are on the forgiving side, and can do with budget
oriented amplification, unless you mean to use an outright "bad"
amplifier. The high(ish) sensitivity and easy load (see below) make them
an easy match for most amps.
Their strengths are many. Human voices in particular
do nearly everything right, with no obvious tonal imbalance. The
soundstage is wide and deep, the slender columns easy to tweak placement
for wherever I'm sitting. The entire frequency range is clean and
smooth, without noticeable rough top end (common to many full-range
designs). With a sub in place, the bass is well balanced and smooth.
Dynamics are not excellent, but sufficient. Instrument placement and
soundstage are stable, easy to interpret, and really don't get much
better than these speakers reproduce. I can listen to music all day long
through the Zigmahornets, which I can't say of many larger full-range
driver loudspeakers.
Conclusion
These are excellent ‘small' speakers. Apart
from the limitations described above, they're fantastic, enjoyable,
affordable, highly environment-friendly (Read: high wife acceptance
factor) loudspeakers. They're also very easy to build, especially if you're
smart enough to make the base quite robust.
Following Up
This review has been a long time coming, since
almost exactly a year ago when I first received the drivers. There are
several reasons for this. A damaged driver, a cracked speaker (see
review) and the need to build new bases.
How time flies. During that time, Dave Merrill, the
man who designed the DCA4 driver has passed on. The driver is still in
production and available at DIYparadise.com.
The plan mockups are available there too, as drawn by Dave Dlugos of
Planet10hifi. The price has also increased to approximately $100 USD
(they're shipping out of Singapore, now).
Specifications
Type: Single driver, floor standing quarterwave loudspeaker
Nominal
Impedance: 8 Ohms
Frequency Range: 80 Hz to 18 kHz
Sensitivity: 90dB/W/m
Enclosure Type: Quarterwave Acoustic Labyrinth
Price: Approximately $100 USD ($143 Singapore Dollars) per pair of
drivers, plus materials