
  
  Issue 212   April 2011
  
  Full Circle
   
  
 
  The audio industry is in the early
  stages of one of those seismic shifts that occurs about once every generation.
  Previous shifts include the "high-fidelity movement" in the 1950s and early
  60s, the rise of Japanese audio in the late 1960s through the mid-70s (fueled
  in part by military personnel returning from Asia with PX-bought gear), and
  the advent of the modern high-end industry beginning in the mid-1970s.
  Another shift began in the late 1990s when audio became
  subsumed in the rush toward home theater, custom installation, multichannel
  audio, and in-wall speakers. When audio became an adjunct, rather than a
  central, technology, sound quality was an afterthought. This happened just as
  the housing boom coincided with the availability of new technologies such as
  DVD, discrete multichannel audio, computer-based home automation, flat-panel
  televisions, high-definition video, satellite delivery, digital-video
  recorders, and the Internet. For upper-income consumers, a custom theater room
  with whole-house automation became the defining status symbol. The
  custom-installation industry grew so explosively that peripheral players such
  as security-system and central-vacuum contractors joined the feeding frenzy
  and found themselves designing, specifying, installing, and calibrating audio
  systems. Needless to say, these companies were ill-equipped to deliver
  anything close to good sound for their clients. Consequently, once the
  razzle-dazzle wore off of drapes that closed automatically when the video
  projector was turned on, consumers were stuck with audio performance that left
  them musically unfulfilled. It was not unusual for clients to spend several
  hundred thousand dollars and not have one room in which the sound quality was
  equal to that possible from a $1500 high-end system.
  It wasn't just wealthy consumers who were short-changed;
  music reproduction was compromised for everyone by the dictates of
  sound-for-picture. The same amount of money once spent on a modest stereo
  system was now spread among six loudspeakers and an AVR overloaded with
  useless features. Sound quality wasn't the only casualty. The insanely
  complicated user interfaces of these theater systems, from a $149 AVR to the
  most sophisticated custom-control system, erected a barrier between listeners
  and their music.
  Concomitantly, the consumer was exploited through planned
  and stunningly rapid obsolescence of products and technologies. Although many
  of the technological advances were legitimate (Dolby TrueHD and DTS HD Master
  Audio, for examples), some were designed purely to "churn" products. The
  developers of intellectual property (think decoding algorithms) get paid a
  per-unit license fee. And chip manufacturers need to keep their production
  lines running and stockholders happy. A product life of even five years wouldn't
  create enough turnover to satiate the intellectual property licensors and the
  chipmakers. The solution was a never-ending series of new surround-decoding
  algorithms and interfaces (various versions of HDMI, for example) that could
  render a product just a year old obsolete. Every step in this diabolical
  progression is documented in the absurd alphabet soup of technology acronyms
  memorialized on the front panel of every modern AV receiver. And now we have
  3-D television that requires new video displays, new disc players, and a new
  interface.
  Although the home-theater boom undoubtedly helped many
  high-end audio companies, those specialty companies making AV controllers
  found themselves at a distinct competitive disadvantage. The mass-market AVR
  manufacturers worked hand-in-hand with the decoding licensors and chip
  manufacturers in developing new DSP chips, giving them a long head start in
  incorporating the new chips in their products. High-end companies had to wait
  until the general release of the chip before even beginning the lengthy
  product-development process. By the time the high-end product hit the market,
  the licensor/electronics manufacturer/chip-maker consortium had developed yet
  another chip that rendered the technology in the high-end product obsolete, in
  actuality or in consumer perception. The deck was stacked against the
  high-end.
  This unsustainable trend has run its course. The housing
  market collapse, the rejection of ostentatious materialism, the return to
  fundamental values, and consumer dissatisfaction with more and more complex
  technology delivering a less and less satisfying musical experience have
  culminated in the end of this era. By all indicators, consumers are starting
  to return to performance-oriented, two-channel music systems. This isn't just
  my perception; I've been hearing the same refrain from many audio
  manufacturers over the past two years.
  But it wasn't just the economic crisis driving this trend
  — the iPod played perhaps a larger and more significant role. Yes, the
  device that some audiophiles love to hate was instrumental in the movement
  back toward two-channel music listening. The iPod not only brought music back
  to its two-channel roots, it rescued music from AV hardware and made music
  listening accessible to many people through its simple and direct user
  interface. Compare the accessibility of music through an iPod with that of an
  AV receiver remote control and a multichannel speaker system with a subwoofer.
  Listeners discovered their music libraries anew, unencumbered by
  surround-sound, gimmicks, a television screen, ever-changing technologies,
  rapid obsolescence, feature overload, and preposterously complex user
  interfaces.
  The high-end industry, which once eagerly embraced the
  opportunity to reach a larger market, is similarly turning away from the
  conflation of music with a film-soundtrack playback system. For example,
  Parasound recently abandoned work on a 7.1-channel hardware platform and has
  instead devoted the company's resources to a new CD player, a phono
  preamplifier, and a stereo preamplifier with some nifty features that enable
  it to integrate with a theater system. The preamplifier works in conjunction
  with an AVR in a theater system, but cannot be rendered obsolete by new DSP
  chips in AVRs. When the AVR's interfaces and decoding technologies are
  outdated, you simply buy a new (dirt-cheap) AVR. In addition, the preamplifier
  allows the system to function as a simple-to-use two-channel stereo for music
  listening. Parasound founder Richard Schram told me at this CES that he's much
  happier, on a personal level, now that he's devoting his time, energy, and
  company resources to music products rather than playing the game of keeping up
  with constantly changing technologies that seem to offer little musical
  satisfaction. I can relate to his feelings; I made the decision last year to
  let my book Home
  Theater for Everyone go out of print rather than constantly update
  it. I'd rather spend my limited time and energy on music and two-channel
  technology.
  As
  we enter the second decade of the 21st century, music listening is finally
  escaping from the hijacking of the late 1990s and returning full-circle to
  where it began. 
  .
  
    
      
    
      
    
     
     
  
  SUBSCRIBE!
  Click here to subscribe
  to The Abso!ute Sound.