|
February 2014
JC Whitney was the home of "Thundervolt" spark
plugs, that were supposed to increase your horsepower and fuel economy by 10%,
and "Vortex" carburetor inserts that were supposed to increase your horsepower
and fuel economy by 10%, and all kinds of other air cleaners, cold air intake
systems, mufflers, exhaust cut-outs, fuel additives, doodads, thingamajiggies,
and you-name-its all of which were each supposed to increase your car's
horsepower and fuel economy by 10% (except, of course, for the ones that were
supposed to increase your power and economy by 15% or even more, but they were
usually either too expensive for a kid to even consider, or had to be
professionally installed). Glorying over the cheap pulp paper and often
blurry black-and-white pictures and blurbs of those JC Whitney catalogs of yore,
my youthful eyes would often glaze over as I thought of what might happen when
older and richer, and actually having a car I would someday buy and
install ALL of the offered toys and goodies and possess a vehicle that would
amaze the world both with its near-infinite horsepower and its requirement for
practically no fuel at all! Sound familiar? Sure it does. The only things
that have changed are the times and the subject matter: Now that we all have
cars, and have mostly grown-up past our hot rod days, it's our audio systems
that we dream about, and not horsepower or fuel economy but "musical reality"
(whatever that may mean to each of us) that we hope to achieve. And unlike, the
JC Whitney catalog, which was pretty much a one-piece wish list, today we have
quite literally hundreds, if not thousands of places to look for what we might
want and an even greater number of people telling us why we should or shouldn't
want them. Even so, the questions, remain the same: What's real; what gives the
most "bang" for the buck; who or what can you believe; and why? Practically every manufacturer offers at least some kind of reason why his products are better and more worthy of your buying dollars than his competitors'. Sometimes, though, no reasons are given, and sometimes the ones that are given are anything from "not fully supported" to "iffy", to purest bullsh*t. There are even reasons that are perfectly correct and true, but of little or no consequence. How is that possible? , How can you tell them apart? And how should you deal with them? Well, just to put it all in perspective let us try this: It is certainly possible, harking back, for a moment, to JC Whitney and an automotive example, that "magic" sparkplugs could increase both horsepower and fuel economy but only if the regular spark plugs weren't doing what they were supposed to do to begin with. A sparkplug that sometimes misfires, or that doesn't fire at all, will certainly limit an engine's output and will certainly waste fuel, but as long as a "regular" plug is working properly, a "magic" plug won't do anything better at all! The very expensive platinum sparkplugs that are used almost universally, these days, are certainly an improvement over what went before, but it's because they last far longer, not because they make more power or use less fuel than a properly-working conventional plug. In audio, we have all kinds of things that, like those two sparkplug examples will make an improvement over conventional products: Some of them, just like the "magic" sparkplugs, will work their wonders only if the parts they're replacing have been or become a problem by not working properly; others, like those (really 100,000 mile) platinum plugs will make a real improvement, but it may not be the kind of improvement you'd expect or were looking for. Still others (some cables, for example) may make a real improvement for reasons that can't be measured and that even (some of) their manufacturers may be unable to explain. Finally, there are others that make a real improvement, but either it could have been made better or more easily some other way (pantographic radial tonearms, for example, that, with great expense, great complexity, and many [potentially "chattering"] bearings reduce LP tracking error that a tangential arm would eliminate entirely) or that like silver plating on an amplifier or preamp's chassis will certainly increase its surface conductivity, but at great expense for an improvement that, while real, serves no known purpose.
The problem for a potential buyer, whether of
auto parts and goodies long ago from the JC Whitney catalog, or now, looking for
Hi-Fi "tweaks" in the audiophile press, the groups, and the blogosphere, is to
figure out which of all the contending products and supporting claims out there
are real; which really are "voodoo" or "snake oil"; and which of the "real" ones
are actually likely to make a difference at least as great as their cost. I have no hard and fast answers for you on those
subjects, but I do have some rules that might help you make up your own mind
when choosing products or "tweaks" for your System:
The more you follow these simple rules in building your system, the better it will sound, the less time, money, and effort you'll waste on things that sound better twice once when you put them in your system, and once again, when you take them out and the more you'll... Enjoy the Music!
|
|
|