Interview With Paul McGowan PS Audio Founder
Interview by Patrik Klangerstedt
This year CES show in Las Vegas was said to be the biggest
ever. The major part of the audio show was located in hotel Alexis Park and the
nearby hotel St. Tropez that hosted the T.H.E. show.
One of the most crowded rooms was the PS audio room, where
their new Power Plant products where displayed as well as their new amplifier
and lab cable. This room (or actually 2 rooms) where very much different from
majority of the other rooms. Paul McGowan had most of his family there, and
all of them dressed in colorful Hawaiian style shirts. The atmosphere was
relaxed and friendly. They had a nice set up where a handful of power
conditioners and line filters where displayed together with the Power Plant.
These units where connected to a oscilloscope and a big screen, and one could
monitor what the different units where actually doing as well as comparing the
difference between them and the power plant.
This was highly educational, and proved beyond doubt the
effectiveness of Power plant. I agreed to meet up with Paul at the end of the day so that
he could give us an interview regarding his background, his work, and his
thoughts on future of audio. Our thought was to present the persons behind the
products that we read about, and to be able to hear their thoughts, ideas and
goals.
P.K: Mr. Paul McGowan, could you give us the background how you got into audio, how PS audio
started?
P. McG: I am
basically self thought, I do not have an engineering degree, this might sound
amazing that I do not have it, but this is how it is.
P.K: Maybe this
is why you actually did things the way you did, since you where not conditioned
by conventional thinking?
P.McG: There are
good sides and bad sides to education. One bad side is that you learn what you
can’t do.
So I don’t know that I can’t do things, so I tend to do
them, and once I ran into a roadblock, I say: well we go this way, and I have
been pretty successful doing that. Its not been that easy, have I had the
engineering background, but I had a lot of good teachers along the way.
We started in 1973; I was a disc jockey at that time. At the
radio station I did a lot of the engineering, since that was my fascination.
The owner of the radio station wanted to get some new equipment, and they did
not have a lot of money, so he asked me if I would consider building some of
it. They needed new phono pre-amplifiers. Said and done; I went on and built a
phono pre-amplifier for the station, getting the information trough series of
books and trough studying, and applying some of my own ideas.
I tested it on my home system, which was a Kenwood
integrated, and it sounded good.
Since I did not have any serious test equipment at the time,
I took it over to a friend of mine who was a big audiophile, and asked him if I
may try it on his system before delivering it to the radio station.
I had built it with two 9-volt batteries, and it was in a
wooden cigar box.
He had a huge 3 amp'ed system with Audio Research, Radco
turntable and Jensen Electrostats. He
took one look at my cigar box and said; No way that thing is going to hook up
to my system !!
He send me to a person that worked for him; he was into
hi-fi and according to him was crazy enough to like that stuff, so go and hook
it up at his place"
So I went over to Stan Warren’s house and hooked it up and
it sounded really good.
Next morning he knocked on my door and put 500 dollars on
the table (a lot of money in those days), and I was really broke. Next thing he
said was: "I want to buy half of your company". I sad "I don’t have a company".
He said: " Oh yeah, you do" - "We are going to start a company and we
are going to build those boxes, and we are going to sell to audiophiles" And I
said: "Audio who’s?" So he told me about audiophiles and business, and that’s
how PS Audio started. (P for Paul and S for Stan)
PK: By that time
you had gained some good reputation?
P.McG: Oh yes, we
had power amplifiers, we had invented the first PDA processor, the company had
always had a lot of good innovations. In 1990 I sold PS Audio, and started Genesis
loudspeakers with Arny Nudel, who used to be the president of Infinity.
We did about 10 years together, and about a year and a half ago I restarted PS
Audio. The owners that bought it from me had done well for quite some time, but
business went down, mostly because of argument between the owners. Steve one of
the partners left, he is now the president of Wadia.
P.K: So you
purchased the right for the name?
P.McG: Yes, I
purchased only the name not the company, and we started our present work.
P.K: When you
purchased the name, what was your plan, what did you want to do?
P.McG: When I had
left Genesis, I wanted something to do, at that time the Power plant was not
conceived.
I started to think; what do I want to do with PS audio?
There are plenty of amplifiers out there, pre amps and DAC's. I had done the
Digital Lens for Genesis, so I was interested in this kind of technology. But
with the unclear situation around DVD and SACD it was very uncertain where the
market was going, so I decided that maybe I should do something very basic.
Power being the basic thing, I had always believed that it was the absolutely
most important thing.
Many years ago I discovered a different way of thinking. A
power amp can be viewed as an amplifier that is just like a giant valve, so you
put all your attention to the amplifier and you feed it with the power
supply. Another way of thinking is that
the power supply is the most important thing, and that the amplifier only
modulates the power supply. It is a
same thing, but a different mind set, a different way of thinking.
That idea has been going on in my head for a long time,
therefore I decided; why not start where the beginnings of all problems are -
at the source. So we start there and we work our way back.
P.K: When did the
product start to materialize, and transfer from thought process to physical product?
P.McG: A lot of time I do what I call freethinking,
where I don’t worry about practical issues. Sometimes I just take long walks in
the mountains where I live. On one of my walks I had a though game: Forgetting
the practical issues, what would be the best way to deal with power?" The first
thing I realized is that I can’t change the power that comes from the wall.
Unless you have a generator on the back yard or a nuclear power plant. The idea
I had been a large electric motor hooked up to a generator, in this way it
would not matter what happens at front. If the power went down, you would have
a governor so that the motor has constant speed, that would produce perfect
electricity. So that was my first idea.
Build it all in a box, the motor generator etc.
The problem is that after a while people would start calling
that the bearing is gone or generator is broke, I smell ozone or the wife is
angry because of noise.
So then I thought how else can I do that?
Then it struck me; of course I can do it electronically. So I decided to make an amp, and feed it a
sine wave, so that was how it all came to be the rest was a matter how to make
it work.
P.K. The process
is to convert AC to DC and then back to AC?
P.McG: Yes, and
then you have a stereo power amp because we wanted it balanced.
In the smaller power plant we have to transformers in
parallel due to size and to avoid the hum.
P.K: How long
time did it take you to get a ready product from the laboratory prototype, and
what was the procedure?
P.McG: I went to
my production manager, Rick Cullen, who has produced all of PS Audio Gear and
most of Genesis products, and I said: This is what I want to build". He and I
worked together for about 4 months, struggling to get this to be a product. All
of the PC-boards had to be made etc. Once we had the prototype done, we built
10 Beta units. The first 10 units where
built in the AIR amplifier chassis. The manufacturer had 10 boxes extra so we
hand built the first 10 samples.
By that time I had
set up the homepage on Internet. So I
started telling people about this new technology: "This is not a power
conditioner, this is a power generator" - trying to get the point across, it
was hard. I said that if anybody out there would like to try it for free, we
would pick 10 people. We would send it out, and the requirements are that you
try it on every thing you can. We want to know what you like and what you don’t
like. I further said that we would tell the world, the good and the bad. What
ever you say, I am going to publish it.
P.K. That was a
very bold thing to do!
PMcG: Yes, it was
very bold, but we did it. And we had one person that could never hear any
difference, and all the other nine just went crazy, in fact their quotes are
all over web site. In US we sell all our products with 30 day money back guarantee, and our return rate is less than 4 %, the remaining 96% take it and
they love it.
P.K: You are
using the manufacturer for your chassis that is manufacturing for many known
brands?
P.McG: Yes, it is
Neal Feay, who is the biggest chassis manufacturer in the world. He is making
products for Theta, Classé, Faroudja, BAT etc.
I had designed every PS Audio chassis since the day it started. And they where nice looking black boxes,
they where not anything special. So we got complaints by people who looked at
Mark Levinson, and Jeff Roland and all these really pretty products, and
compared it to our products.
Therefore I hired Alex Rasmussen who designed each of these
new products. He is very much into architecture and industrial design. This
time I decided that we wanted to have products that looked really nice. The
fact is that things that look nice are not much more expensive to build than
not so nice once, if you know what you are doing. What cost more is that you
normally pay someone to design it for you.
P.K: After the
Beta versions where ready you started the shipping?
P.McG: We made a
lot of changes in the production line, right up to the last day. That was based
on what people found – what they liked and did not like.
P.K: Shortly
after that you started getting positive reviews from different hi-fi magazines?
P.McG: Indeed,
our biggest review was in Stereophile, which came in December, but prior to
that we have had a number of other reviews. Magazines are always looking for
things that are new; they want to present new things for their readers.
P.K: The positive
reception seems to be based on the fact that the product is not just another
gimmick?
P.McG: There is a
side of me that does not like what I call "the snake oil". I really object to
it, it’s my conviction that it hurts our industry. They create an expectation
and excitement with the customer, who takes the product home and realizes that
it did not make that much of a difference or improvement.
Things that I do, I like them to make sense. The power plant
makes absolute sense.
P.K: From there
you went on to developing the Lab cable, that also is a very interesting
product?
P.McG: O what a
field to jump into! We wanted to start basically from the plug and work our way
to the reproduction equipment. I felt that now that we have perfect power, to
try to deliver it properly.
There are many fine cables around. But I felt that lot of it
did not make any sense.
I looked at it from
the begging asking the question: "What does a good cable need to do?" – "What
makes a good cable?"
I found 2 really important things: It needs a lot of finely
stranded copper, since you need a lot of surface area, and a lot of copper so
that you keep the DC resistance very low. After that you want to make sure that
you have good shielding. We looked at
the telecommunication industry how they shield things. They triple shield their cables. Each shield
takes down the transmitted radiation.
So that is how we built our prototype, and it sounded very good.
P.K: It was
however not very easy to get that cable manufactured?
P.McG: No, at first we could not find anyone to do
it. We went to over 100 companies with our specifications. I expected to get 10-15 answers back. Only two companies came back and said:
"Yes,
we can build it" – and one of them was twice the price of the other. There was
not a lot of choice. (smiling)
We went there and looked at the process how the cables where
made, as can be seen on our web page.
I found it interesting. My first thought was that this
should be easy to do. But it turns out
to be quite complex procedure.
P.K: Although the
cable has a large diameter it is surpassingly flexible?
P.McG: That was
one of the criteria when designing the cable. A lot of work went into what
insulation materials and sleeves that should be used to make it flexible and
practical to use.
P.K. At which
point did you decide to use it as loudspeaker cable, since you initially
designed it as AC cable?
P.McG: As I was
building it, it dawn on me that power delivery is a same basic thing, but at
different frequency, and since there was nothing limiting the frequency in this
design, we tried it out and it sounded great.
It makes sense; if you design a proper power delivery for AC it should
also work for speakers.
It is very quit, and if it has any drawback it is its
capacitance. Depending on which power amplifier you are using it could have the
top end slightly rolled off. This cable
has mid range, mid base and bottom end like no other cable I have heard in my
30 years of audio. Every cable has some weaknesses, but apart from the very
slight roll of, every other aspect: the space, the weight, the harmonic balance
and extension are exceptional.
P.K: This cable
like the rest of your products appears to be priced very competitively?
P.McG: We have a
standard pricing formula that we use, which is about half what others are
charging.
It makes it little more difficult for distributors and
dealers, because their margin is less, and my margin is less. But it benefits
the end users and it keeps my competitors away. (Laughter) Because when they go out and try to build
the power plant, they realize it can’t be done for a lower price.
P.K: With all of
this done, what are you ideas and thought about future audio?
P.McG: I would
like to produce the Digital Lens that is compatible with future standards. We
do have a new product coming out that has to do with the real power factor and
correction of that. So there is lot on our plate that we want to do. As far as
high-end audio, in my opinion, the future is not 2 channel for music.
One of my dreams has always been to create a system of true
surround sound, where one really feels that he is in an environment. We have an
Amphi theater where I live, and Detroit Philharmonic Orchestra comes to play
there. When I sit in the audience and close my eyes, and try to visualize that
I am in a room trying to listen to a stereo – and I cannot do it, because I
hear everybody around me, I hear the reverb hitting of the side. I can tell,
and you could not fool me that I am not in a room.
What I would like to do is to recreate that space, and the
only way to do that is to surround your self with 5 channels or what ever it
takes. You cannot do it with the present compressed medium, and you have to
record for that. You would literally have microphones set up that places you in
the audience, with side microphones properly placed, and reproduce that
perfectly back on a system. That is the
future. The 2-channel system is just too limited.
People talk about great imaging and they hear the images
behind the loudspeakers, but that does not fool me that I am at a live concert,
never has and never will.
Someday if we are really going to make some progress, we
have to put our heads in a right space, and I would like to at some point move
that forward. That would be a great project.
P.K: That sounds
like a great challenge, considering the inertia of the soft and hardware
industry?
P.McG: "No
question about it" With a smile on his face he continued: "But I just might be
dumb enough to think that we might be able to do something. After all the
bumble bee cannot fly, but it does not know that."
With this word Paul ended the interview, and I left the room
with a smile on my face, thinking that behind all the major innovative
inventions, there always is a burning spirit and a personality, something that
this industry needs more of.