|
Fall
2008 Capacitor Musings Part 2
"The construction principle of the series WIMA MKP 10 consists of a non-metalized dielectric film and an carrier film metalized on both sides acting as electrode. Thanks to the metallization on both sides, the electrical conductivity is considerably improved and the contact surface between the electrodes and the schoopage layer is doubled. This results in better contact and allows for high current and pulse loading capability." The reason I am even going into such detail is due to the fact its sound quality easily exceeded my jaded expectations. It sounded quite bright at first, but after settling down, it presented a nicely-detailed, airy, and sexily breathy sound. It perhaps does not have 100% of the refinement and sophistication of Dynamicap E or Jantzen Superior Z, but its slightly more forward and breathy sound is a bit more exciting and ear-grabbing. It's not overly etched or thin-sounding, either, which you always have to watch out for in cheap metalized poly caps. I have heard some people complain WIMA lacks bass, but this was not true in my case at all, as its bass was just as good as other good poly caps. I don't know how WIMA's other caps sound, such as MKP4 and FKP, but the 630V MKP10 is a budget-champ!
The longer I listened to AudioCap Theta, I was both more charmed and frustrated at the same time. It's density of tone and authoritative texturing in the midrange was very tasty, which only highlighted its Achilles' heel, i.e. somewhat dark and shut-in upper highs compared to the best. Hoping for luck, I tried bypassing the AudioCap Theta with FT-1 Russian Teflon's 1/10th its value. Even though both caps were burned-in, the resulting sound was initially horrid: overly bright, grating, and just amusical. Knowing these things take time, even with previously used caps, I ran them for some time, and like magic, everything fell into place. The combination was at once rich, textured, and warm, yet with intact high-frequency leading edge detail and sparkle. This casserole of sorts yielded very, very satisfying results, working much better than when I bypassed oil caps with small Teflon caps. I must presume that oil caps and Teflon caps are simply too different to gel coherently; combining more similar film caps really hit on something wonderful here. In fact, to check my own impressions, I put back one of my expensive Teflon references; and I honestly can't tell you I definitely prefer the Teflons. The Teflons still have a smidge more see-through transparency and smoother liquidity, but the Theta/Teflon combo has more weight and texture behind the notes while not giving up overall resolution and punch. This combo is a definite contender in the right system.
After the usual rough period of settling in, Vit Q's came alive with beautiful tonal color, bags of textural contrast, and a sense of immediacy. There is a "wetness" to its presentation that is quite beguiling, yet it's very detailed and sparkling, definitely not polite or overly dark. If you find the Jensen copper PIO's a little too refined and buttery smooth in your system, Vit Q's might fit in very well instead. On the other hand, many audiophiles prefer that velvety smooth sound, in which case they will likely prefer something like Jensens. Both offer more openness and air compared to the denser sound of Russian K40y PIO's, but all three PIO's are capable of doing music justice with synergistic placement. Previously I tried bypassing the Jensens with small Russian Teflon caps to add a litte more sparkle and contrast, but in the end I decided I prefer the Jensens by itself to preserve its own charms. I have no such desire to bypass the Vit Q because it seems to have enough contrasty sparkle already. Vit Q's don't sound like good polypropylene caps, Teflon caps, polystyrenes, or anything else, really, but they have a unique, involving character that's hard not to enjoy.
POSTSCRIPT (?) Secondly, the price of the capacitor does not necessarily predict the end result. While some of the great Teflon capacitors have to be expensive by their nature, there are numerous "cheap" capacitors out there that will have no trouble passing the musical signal in satisfying manner. Many expensive capacitors do sound great, as they should given their price, but a careful DIY'er can arrive at very satisfying results at a fraction of the cost, especially when total system synergy is taken into account. Thirdly, some have requested a simpler table of rankings and scores for all these capacitors, but if you have read this article thus far, you should already have a feeling that there can be no concrete ranking by the numbers. I feel that most of the better capacitors auditioned are capable of "beating" each other depending on the specific application, taste of the listener, type of music, overall system configuration, and of course, the cycle of the moon. I'd rather not presume that my rankings are superior to other people's rankings; as long as one has tried reasonable capacitors and chose with his ears and enjoys the music, that's really all that matters in the end, isn't it? Until next time...
|
|