Regular readers will
know that I have in the past used my editorial page as a soapbox to complain
about both the level of background noise in restaurants, and the sound quality
of the sound systems used by restaurateurs to play background music in their
restaurants. And, although I have taken sound pressure level meters onto
aeroplanes before to measure noise levels, I have never taken one into a
restaurant. However, last year, someone did. Daniel Castro, of Sydney firm
Wood & Grieve Engineers, was commissioned by the Sydney Morning Herald's
Good Food Guide to check the noise levels of a number of restaurants in Sydney
and Melbourne. I wasn't surprised to read (in articles in the SMH written by
Nina Rousseau and Richard Cornish) that noise levels in some cases exceeded
the official WorkCover safe limit of 85dB SPL. At two restaurants,
Café Nice (Sydney) and Chin Chin (Melbourne), the two acoustical engineers
recorded measurements of 95dB SPL!
Not that either of
the restaurateurs was apologetic, with Barry McDonald, of Café Nice telling
Rousseau: 'I like a certain noise level in my restaurants. It helps create
atmosphere.' Chris Lucas, of Chin Chin, went even further. 'You can't have fun
without noise', he told Rousseau. 'We set out to replicate the buzz of a Thai
street market.' Fairfax's food writer, Richard Cornish, obviously thinks their
statements were disingenuous, to obscure the real reason behind the noise
levels. 'Absorbing sound costs money. It's one of the things that gets cut in
tough times.' And restaurants are certainly doing it tough, with many icons
shutting up shop entirely, and others changing their names and moving
downmarket in search of patronage. As I have said previously, I think high
noise levels turn off customers, most of whom aren't there so much for the
food as to enjoy the company of the people they're dining with... and if you
can't hear what they're saying, you can't really enjoy their company.
However, on a far
more important note, anyone working in a restaurant that regularly has noise
levels that even approach 95dB SPL runs a real risk of losing their hearing.
Pay rates for wait-staff isn't high anyway, but no amount of money could ever
compensate for going deaf as a result of working in a restaurant. At least
flight attendants, who endure noise levels exceeding 88dB SPL for periods of
up to ten hours at a time (which would certainly damage their hearing), get to
see the world while they're going deaf. Meanwhile, the pilots and engineers
get to wear noise-cancelling headphones, not to mention that because they're
up the pointy end, well ahead of the engines, it's a lot quieter than down the
back where the crew are working. But back to restaurants, and it appears that
I'm not alone in complaining about noisy ones. Roslyn Grundy, of The Age Good
Food Guide 2014, says many Guide users ask for 'quiet restaurant'
recommendations. 'We get a lot of feedback from people saying they can't hear
the conversation at their own table, let alone eavesdrop on the table next to
them,' she said. Noise can also apparently affect your tastebuds. An
experiment by Russell Keast, an associate professor of food and sensory
science at Deakin University, proved that high levels of background noise
reduced a taster's ability to detect salt and sweet foods. It's been theorised
that this may be one reason the meals served on planes taste so bland.
I'd suggest that the
other reason is that they're deliberately made that way, but that's just my
personal opinion. In the meantime, I'd suggest that to protect your hearing,
and to maximise your enjoyment of your meals, you should boycott all
restaurants with excessive noise levels. And in those situations where you can't
help being in a noisy restaurant, be sure to give your waitperson a generous
tip: the extra money will help pay for their hearing aids a little later on in
their life!
---
Greg
Borrowman